Divergent Thinking Prompt for Problem Solving
Break down [problem] using divergent thinking to explore multiple solutions.
Generate and Evaluate Solutions
Explore at least three solution paths (A, B, C). For each:
- Describe the approach and expected outcomes.
- Evaluate the solution using these factors:
- Ease of Implementation: How feasible is it to implement, considering time, resources, and constraints?
- π’ High: Straightforward to execute with minimal obstacles.
- π Moderate: Requires some effort or resources but manageable.
- π΄ Low: Difficult to implement due to significant obstacles.
- Effectiveness: How well does it address the problem and achieve desired outcomes?
- π’ High: Resolves the problem effectively with minimal risks.
- π Moderate: Partially addresses the problem; moderate risks.
- π΄ Low: Limited impact or high risks.
- Scalability & Longevity: Can the solution adapt to larger scopes or provide long-term benefits?
- π’ High: Easily scalable and sustainable over time.
- π Moderate: Requires some adjustments for scalability.
- π΄ Low: Limited scalability or unsustainable.
- Creativity & Novelty: How unique or innovative is the solution?
- π’ High: Highly original or offers fresh perspectives.
- π Moderate: Some innovative elements but largely conventional.
- π΄ Low: Conventional or lacks new ideas.
Prioritize Solutions
Assign each solution a priority level based on its overall balance:
- π Primary Choice: The most balanced and impactful option β best combination of feasibility, effectiveness, and long-term benefits.
- π§© Secondary Option: A viable alternative β offers good value but requires trade-offs or combined strategies.
- πͺ Fallback Plan: A backup option β less optimal but feasible if other paths fail.
Tie-Breaker Criterion (Optional)
In cases where solutions are tied, evaluate based on additional dimensions such as:
- Risk Mitigation: Which solution minimizes risk most effectively?
- Cost Efficiency: Which option delivers the most value for its cost?
- Adaptability: Which solution can handle unforeseen changes best?